Family History

The Tipsy Tide-Waiter

Tweet This

A tide-waiter is essentially a Custom’s man. He waits on the tides at the docks until the boats come in and then must check the cargo. Cargoes of spirits were tricky, as long voyages led to considerable evaporation through the barrels and seals. Spirits were often pilfered and subject to fraud and deception. Duty had to be paid on the spirits brought into the country and so accurate assessment of the amount on board was vital.

Experienced Custom’s men or Tide-Waiters knew the approximate amount of evaporation that would occur on a voyage and would assess whether what was arriving in port corresponded with the paperwork for when the ship left the previous port.

Percival Hindmarsh was a single man who was born in 1812 near Falstone in the hills of Northumberland. He and his younger brother were left orphaned in 1821 and ended up living with their unmarried Uncle, William Hindmarsh, a grocer in Clayport Street in Alnwick. Percival, in the 1830s and early 1840s can be found in Newfoundland working as a tide-waiter, but on 4th August 1850 he arrives in Australia and begins work as a tide-waiter in Sydney.

New South Wales, Australia, Public Service Lists, 1858-1860

This list from New South Wales Australia Public Service Lists 1858-1870, for 1858, shows Percival as 3rd Tide-Waiter just before his early death at the age of 46 in 1859. You will see from the notes at the bottom of the table that a few customs staff were suspended and it becomes clear from Percival’s subsequent inquest that a large investigation into the day to day running of Customs at Sydney was starting to gain momentum.

PH-exhumedInitially Percival’s body is buried but someone, it is not clear who, raises concerns about the manner of his death and so, against the wishes of all who knew him, his body was exhumed, as you can see from this report in the Sydney Morning Herald.

The Coroner then opened an inquest, in which Finney Eldershaw described Percival in the following way

“I am clerk in the Legislative Council, and have known the deceased Percival Hindmarsh for about eight years; he was landing waiter in the Customs: he was a single man and of late resided in Princes Street; he was about 47 years of age, was a single man, and never, to my knowledge, had a days illness, he was remarkably healthy, and had resided for some time past in Prince street;”

William R. T. Passmore deposed : I am a landing-waiter in the Customs, and have known deceased for five years; he was generally employed out of doors, and, consequently, much exposed to the sun; on Saturday, the 19th. deceased and myself were gauging casks on MaCnamara’s Wharf, when he complained of the excessive heat; he complained it affected his head, and had to go into the landing-waiter’s box to rest ; I requested him to take a nobbler of brandy, but he declined, saying he had already taken one that morning; I did not see him again until Monday morning.

summary-inquest-phThroughout the Inquest Percival is referred to as a sober man. I do not think we would view him that way now, however the way that life was then it was obviously quite normal to drink brandy in the morning, and brandy was considered at the time a cure for sun-stroke which clearly we now know is incorrect. The summer of 1859 in Sydney was particularly hot.

The verdict of the jury was at odds with the evidence and the Coroner was not happy with the verdict:

“The jury retired, and after half an hour’s consultation agreed to, and returned with the following verdict:
“We find that the said Perceval Hindmarsh came by his death from natural causes.”
Rider-“The jury beg to express their opinion, from the evidence produced, that the deceased Percival Hindmarsh was a man of steady, regular, and sober habits: and consider that there were not sufficient grounds to warrant an inquest.”

The Coroner returned the jurymen thanks for the time and attention they had given to the enquiry, and intimated that he was bound to accept their verdict, though he must inform them that it was not in accordance with the evidence.”

Quote from Hindmarsh Family Tree website where further details of this case can be read.


Clearly the conditions that the tide-waiters worked in were not ideal as you can see from this anonymous letter to the newspaper.

So this shows that by simply finding an inquest report you can end up with wonderful details about that person and how they lived and who they know. It is clear from the numerous letters written to the Sydney Morning Herald that Percival was well liked and respected and subsequent newspaper reports relating to him dying intestate and regarding sales of his effects draw an even more detailed picture of this man. The list of his effects lists 2 birds and cages with various chests, clothes and shares.

See the Hindmarsh Family Tree website where further details of this case and the transcript of the Inquest can be read.

Divorce in the 1920s

Tweet This

Prior to 1858 the church courts would decide if married couples should live apart, and could also be asked to judge whether the marriage was invalid. After 1858 an Act was passed that allowed husbands to divorce their wife on the grounds of the wife’s adultery however wives could only divorce the husband if there was also cruelty, bigamy, sexual crime or desertion for 2 years.

It wasn’t until 1925 that the law was changed so that a wife could divorce her husband just for adultery.

In the case of Frances Jones v Frank Jones, Frank had left Frances in September 1921 and had set up home with another woman. Frances petitioned for divorce in May 1924, however by that time Frank had already had one child with the other woman, born 1922, and had another on the way, born December 1924.

As this occurred prior to the change of law in 1925 Frances had to wait for 2 years desertion before she could divorce Frank and she had to survive these years with little support for her 4 young children.


Ultimately maintenance was awarded to Frances in the sum of £24 per month until the end of her life. Maintenance is not finalised until 15th June 1926 and is backdated to the date of the Decree Absolut, 5th August 1925. No mention is made of how Frances supported herself and the 4 children for the 4 years between when Frank left and the divorce was finalised. The maintenance of £24 per month is worth around £3600 per month now.

Motoring Offences in 1921

Tweet This

It is easy to imagine that we have always had cars and other forms of technology but in 1921 the car was a relatively new invention and not many owned them. This gentleman was prosecuted for not making sure no-one else could start his car whilst he was gone.


I like the way the Inspector refers to this being a dangerous practice. The case underneath shows that broken lights were an offence even then.

Life 100 Years Ago

Tweet This

What we perceive as poverty nowadays is very different to the reality of many people’s lives a 100 years ago. Sometimes documentation from over 100 years ago can be a real shock and will produce a scene that is almost impossible to imagine.


In the 1911 census in Morpeth there is this household of 8 people, the parents, 2 adult children and 4 young children from 6 to 15 years of age. This family of 8 people live in one room. The enumerator is instructed to count the kitchen as a room but to not count sculleries, landings, lobbies, bathrooms or offices as rooms. This means this family lives in one room with only a fire to cook on, with all of them sleeping in that one room.

The 1911 census was the first to ask about marriage length and you can see that this couple have been married for 23 years and that during that marriage 15 children were born, 8 of whom have died already. This leaves 7 live children, 6 of whom are still living with their parents.